Saleshandy alternatives: compare stored contacts and live sequence capacity

Define the decision

Saleshandy’s current pricing describes active prospects separately from stored data. A replacement comparison should preserve that distinction, especially when most records are historical or excluded.

Work through the procedure

1. Count stored records, intended active enrollments and message demand independently.
2. Review Smartlead’s current workload allowances for a scale-oriented brief.
3. Trial Zintara’s lead and enrollment states for an email-operations brief.
4. Review Hunter’s per-sequence recipient definitions for a bounded-sequence brief.

Worked example

The following is a synthetic example for this procedure, not a customer result or performance benchmark.

Stored contacts: large historical archive
Active requirement: one small reviewed segment
Migration gate: old replied or excluded records do not become new active enrollments
Cost model: compare actual intended workload rather than total database rows alone

Read the result

The state-mapping exercise can be more important than the headline limit. A migration that loses the reason a contact stopped can create an operational risk even when every CSV row imports.

Check before moving on

1. Validate current plan terms and fair usage.
2. Test an excluded contact appearing in a later import.

Limits and next action

This is a shortlist for controlled evaluation, not a claim that lifecycle or billing definitions match across products. Keep unresolved state mappings visible.

Source: Saleshandy: current active-prospect scope