Zintara vs Saleshandy: compare active workload and contact lifecycle

Define the decision

Saleshandy’s current pricing page distinguishes active prospects in live sequences from stored contacts. Zintara also separates lead records from campaign enrollment state. The two products’ billing and lifecycle semantics should not be assumed identical.

Work through the procedure

1. Define stored contacts, active enrollments and monthly sending demand separately.
2. Check the current Saleshandy capacity and fair-usage terms.
3. In Zintara, inspect an active campaign containing paused, replied and excluded contacts.
4. Test the migration rules that prevent an old record from becoming a new unintended send.

Worked example

The following is a synthetic example for this procedure, not a customer result or performance benchmark.

Dataset: 10,000 stored contacts, 500 intended for current outreach
Evaluation question: which records count as active, and what action changes that state?
Safety check: an imported opt-out remains excluded even if its descriptive lead fields are updated

Read the result

The lifecycle review prevents a capacity comparison from becoming a misleading contacts-count comparison. An inactive record can still carry important suppression history.

Check before moving on

1. Confirm whether CRM or collaboration features are included in the exact plan.
2. Preserve state definitions in the migration mapping.

Limits and next action

No price or feature-parity winner is asserted. Verify the current plan and actual behavior with controlled records before a large import.

Source: Saleshandy: active prospect and current plan context